During the discussion the panel of experts bring up issues about women's oppression during the time period and start off emphasizing the stupidity men expected from the women when bringing them onto the crime scene. The women's attention to detail and discoveries that they choose to hide from the men in order to help their friend's case make them a jury of her peers. The title is particularly important considering women were not allowed to serve in a jury at the time. The men tend to be more rational, while the women approach the world through feeling. Beyond feeling, the women see evidence that is sitting out in plain sight, however it is evidence that requires a special type of intelligence. Making a case in favor of the men, the panel appeal to Mr Hale's language and word choice and how it can be connected to his discomfort, understandable for anyone in this situation. They comment on Mrs. Wright's character before married life and observe that she must've been on the brink of a nervous breakdown for this to happen. Diving deeper into the title, the panel talks about the jury's duty in a courtroom: members should come in impartial, however knowing it's impossible for anyone to be completely unbiased, they should uphold that honor. Setting the stage in rural Iowa has this sense of seeing justice to satisfy the American impulse to make things right outside the law. The panel comes to the conclusion that the decision made by the women will appeal to readers in that they will be able to make up their own minds about what is right and what justice really means.